Peyton Reed directed “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,” the 31st installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. 3″ on May 5, followed by the newly delayed “The Marvels” on Nov. It continues with “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. That’s a good sign because the latest “Ant-Man” adventure has the lofty responsibility of kicking off Phase Five of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Based on opening weekend returns, the newest “Ant-Man” entry is expected to end its box office run with the biggest receipts in the trilogy. The tiniest Avenger may be small, but the third chapter still looks to be mighty. The first “Ant-Man” and its 2018 sequel, which may serve as better points of comparison for “Quantumania,” tapped out with $519 million and $622 million worldwide, respectively. Previous sequels in the sprawling Marvel series, including “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” ($185 million to start), “Thor: Love and Thunder” ($144 million) and “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever” ($181 million), started stronger and eventually earned upwards of $750 million to $950 million globally. Gross, who runs the movie consulting firm Franchise Entertainment Research.Įven with its four-day holiday total, the comic book story centered on Rudd’s subatomic-sized hero isn’t expected to match its towering Marvel counterparts, which traditionally power to the mightiest of the mighty opening weekends. “‘Ant-Man’ isn’t among the top Marvel series, and reviews and audience scores are uncharacteristically soft, but this is excellent business and a big step up for the title,” says David A. In addition to its bleak 49% average on Rotten Tomatoes, audiences saddled the film with a “B” CinemaScore. Critical sentiment rarely matters for opening weekends of Marvel movies, but word-of-mouth could have an impact on ticket sales in the coming weeks. Though the threequel landed the worst reviews of the series (and some of the harshest in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe), “Quantumania” got a huge jump on its predecessors, surging past the openings of 2015’s “Ant-Man” ($57 million) and 2018’s sequel “Ant-Man and the Wasp” ($76 million). All that said, there is also the unavoidable truth that those guys are on this ride for some six to seven years and have failed to make even a compelling demo, let alone show any means of making a full blown triple A game.“’Ant-Man’ is the first new Hollywood blockbuster out of the gate in 2023,” says Imax’s CEO Rich Gelfond, noting that $24 million came from the company’s premium-format screens. Titanic is by itself a huge story and I find doubtful that it is that hard sell to make - provided that you know what you are doing and got something more to share than some models (and to their credit, it all seems extremely well done in this regard).īut games are much, much, much more than locations and, as a developer myself, I'd cringe if someone would push to me this project as a pitch, seeing what we have saw about dialogues, that subpar actor and, god, the writing on the last demo. I really thought that things were moving when they started to release videos every week, but that feel has faded amidst all those reunions, excursions, trips and bizarre and non-relevant content they post by the sheer lack of what to say, show and announce.Ī Titanic game doesn't necessarily have to be a niche title, just ask Cameron. All those recent videos just confirm the impression that I had sometime ago that this team don't really know what they are doing and to where they are pushing. I think it's a pretty safe bet to say that this won't see the light of the day ever.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |